I'm a student of American history but not a political person. Indeed, I think politics is wildly overrated and we'd all be better off just ignoring it. But this year I was kinda fascinated by the rise of Bernie Sanders and the lingering odor that is Donald Trump. This year's race had some excitement to it...which faded for me about ten minutes into the first debate, which I found to be even more anti-climatic than the third Dark Knight movie. Just wanted to take a second to make one last prediction.
I think Hillary Clinton wins by a sizable margin. I have no interest in picking out each state and nailing down a specific electoral vote count so I'll stay fairly general. Normally the Achilles' heel of the Democrats is that their most enthusiastic supporters within the culture are not the most vigilant when it comes to actually voting. No love for the party, just the after-party. But this time around I think Trump will inspire the liberal hordes to rise up and vote. I think they'll turn out not for Hillary but against Trump (hey, that counts, too). I suspect the race is called well before the west coast polls close and that there's never really any doubt that Hilary wins. Just for trivial value I'll take Evan McMullin to win Utah.
But I think they'll have minimal effect on the down ballot races. I'll take the Republicans to easily hold the House (which I don't think is a bold prediction) and to narrowly hold the Senate (most popular commentators are saying it'll be 50-50 giving the White House the tiebreaker). I think the buzz is that if Hillary wins, Obama will immediately rescind the nomination of Merrick Garland (kinda of a shame, I think I really like him) meaning we won't have a proper 9-person court until shortly before the end of the term. And since this campaign has featured zilch discussion of actual policy, I have no idea who Clinton would nominate, even though that's gonna be the first thing she does.
All I know is I'm ready for this to be over. I hate elections, I find they bring out all the worst in the American people and absolutely none of the best. So by Wednesday at least there is the hope that as a a people we can be good again (though hopefully not great).
Monday, November 7, 2016
Thursday, November 3, 2016
World Series
Fuck, what a game! What a series! I love baseball and when it shines out this good, it's such a pleasure to witness. That said, as an Indians fan I wish it had turned out different. Rain delay in the 9th inning....
Look, the Cubs were the best team all year long, no doubt. And after watching the Indians all year long, I loved the team, loved the pitching, loved the coach, loved the vibe, but not until they went up on the Blue Jays did I think they would even make the World Series much less win it. So as a Tribe fan, I'm cool. We had a great year and while the title was palpable, every baseball fan knows that it ain't over til its over. The tricky part as a general baseball fan is knowing all along that the Cubs will be back next year while the Indians will be in the mix in the AL but are by no means a guarantee, so for all the angst of the Cubs fans, they're gonna be dominate the NL for the foreseeable future, they'll have chances to break the curse while us Indians fans needed to hit the mark as soon as possible.
Good year for the Cubs, congrats. After Rajai Davis hit that homer, I really thought all the momentum was going back to Cleveland and the Indians would finish it off. But the baseball gods were rooting for the Cubs. That rain delay...
I think the Cubs should invite Bartman to throw out the first pitch on opening day. He's a legit Cubs fan and to suffer that level of sadness to be associated with the Cubs curse is a unimaginable level of trauma. The curse is over, the championship is won, bringing out Bartman to put the curse to rest is not merely a nice thing to do, it is a necessary thing to do. The Cubs will be good for a while, it is imperative to put the losing past behind them. And to restore a true Cubs fan to his rightful place is the perfect way to do it. It should happen and I think it will. Welcome back to Chicago, Mr. Bartman, the first pitch is yours.
Look, the Cubs were the best team all year long, no doubt. And after watching the Indians all year long, I loved the team, loved the pitching, loved the coach, loved the vibe, but not until they went up on the Blue Jays did I think they would even make the World Series much less win it. So as a Tribe fan, I'm cool. We had a great year and while the title was palpable, every baseball fan knows that it ain't over til its over. The tricky part as a general baseball fan is knowing all along that the Cubs will be back next year while the Indians will be in the mix in the AL but are by no means a guarantee, so for all the angst of the Cubs fans, they're gonna be dominate the NL for the foreseeable future, they'll have chances to break the curse while us Indians fans needed to hit the mark as soon as possible.
Good year for the Cubs, congrats. After Rajai Davis hit that homer, I really thought all the momentum was going back to Cleveland and the Indians would finish it off. But the baseball gods were rooting for the Cubs. That rain delay...
I think the Cubs should invite Bartman to throw out the first pitch on opening day. He's a legit Cubs fan and to suffer that level of sadness to be associated with the Cubs curse is a unimaginable level of trauma. The curse is over, the championship is won, bringing out Bartman to put the curse to rest is not merely a nice thing to do, it is a necessary thing to do. The Cubs will be good for a while, it is imperative to put the losing past behind them. And to restore a true Cubs fan to his rightful place is the perfect way to do it. It should happen and I think it will. Welcome back to Chicago, Mr. Bartman, the first pitch is yours.
Monday, October 31, 2016
World Series (After 5 Games)
When the Indians went up 3-1 on the Cubs I could taste it. But I remember the last time the Indians went up 3-1 in the playoffs (Coach Francona does, too, he was the coach of the Red Sox who came back and won), and it went something like this: I knew Josh Beckett was gonna be untouchable in Game Five (he was), I knew Curt Schilling was gonna be tough in Game Six (he was) and I knew Dice-K was not gonna be an easy out in Game Seven (I was right again). I knew the Indian pitching wasn't as good and the hitting was going to disappear...and it did.
Let's look at this time around: Cubs weren't going quietly in Game Four (they did not), Arrieta will be a beast in Game Five (girl, you know it's true) and in Game Seven Hendricks is gonna want payback for the W he wasn't able to lock down in his very impressive Game Three. Series ain't over, Indians fans. To get that ring we gotta go get that last game. And doing it in Cleveland is not going to be any easier than doing it in Chicago. An ominous observation for these young-and-coming Cubs: Wrigley Field in late October does not look like an environment conducive to left handed power hitting. The Cubs are set to dominate for the next coupla years but their homefield may not be an advantage in the coming Fall Classics. (Also, never really noticed before but, man, Wrigley Field looks like a fuckin' dump! Those brick walls, those narrow dugouts, and you know the parts you don't see can't be any better) The upside for the Cubs though is I think they're better off trying to win in Cleveland than in Chicago.
I picked the Indians in 7 at the beginning and I think I'm gonna stick with that. I think Arrieta has one more masterful game in him that the Indians won't be able to overcome (after which both teams will be 2-1 on the road). And then I'll take Kluber over Hendricks in Game Seven. The Cubs' bats have been pretty soft so far and I think the Indians can make that continue for two more games. The Indians have outscored the Cubs 17-10 so far and 6 of the Cubs' 10 runs came in just two innings, in the other 42 innings they've scored just 4 runs. I think the Indians can make that work.
I really admire these Cubs but I really love these Indians. I think the Cubs push the Indians to the brink but I'll stick with the Tribe to finish 'em off. (Indeed, look for the Indians to win big in Game Seven, just a hunch)
Let's look at this time around: Cubs weren't going quietly in Game Four (they did not), Arrieta will be a beast in Game Five (girl, you know it's true) and in Game Seven Hendricks is gonna want payback for the W he wasn't able to lock down in his very impressive Game Three. Series ain't over, Indians fans. To get that ring we gotta go get that last game. And doing it in Cleveland is not going to be any easier than doing it in Chicago. An ominous observation for these young-and-coming Cubs: Wrigley Field in late October does not look like an environment conducive to left handed power hitting. The Cubs are set to dominate for the next coupla years but their homefield may not be an advantage in the coming Fall Classics. (Also, never really noticed before but, man, Wrigley Field looks like a fuckin' dump! Those brick walls, those narrow dugouts, and you know the parts you don't see can't be any better) The upside for the Cubs though is I think they're better off trying to win in Cleveland than in Chicago.
I picked the Indians in 7 at the beginning and I think I'm gonna stick with that. I think Arrieta has one more masterful game in him that the Indians won't be able to overcome (after which both teams will be 2-1 on the road). And then I'll take Kluber over Hendricks in Game Seven. The Cubs' bats have been pretty soft so far and I think the Indians can make that continue for two more games. The Indians have outscored the Cubs 17-10 so far and 6 of the Cubs' 10 runs came in just two innings, in the other 42 innings they've scored just 4 runs. I think the Indians can make that work.
I really admire these Cubs but I really love these Indians. I think the Cubs push the Indians to the brink but I'll stick with the Tribe to finish 'em off. (Indeed, look for the Indians to win big in Game Seven, just a hunch)
Sunday, October 23, 2016
World Series
I love baseball, have my whole life. But I hate cable TV so I haven't watched much baseball over the years. Last year I started watching the MLB free game of the day, a great way to get a random look around the league. I was doing the free style this year when I got an offer to get the rest of the season for a paltry sum, which I jumped on hard. The downside of that was I didn't get the wide look at the league that I did the previous year; the upside was I watched a ton of my beloved Cleveland Indians. I gotta say: I love this team. This is a fun team to watch, they battle, they're clever players, Terry Francona is the man (he won me over two years ago, when he led a really green bunch of bananas into the post-season), and these guys all love each other (a quality palpable in baseball more than any of the other sports). I thought this team was good but flawed, hard working but not necessarily the more talented team night in/night out.
The Cubs, on the other hand, caught my eye last year while pummeling the Cards in the playoffs. They faltered against the Mets but that's okay, they're a young team that was already ahead of schedule. You could tell that 2016 was gonna be their year. They avoided the pitfalls, sidestepped all the tragedies (curses and whatnot), and dominated the NL like they should've. Winning the division was a big step, getting through the playoffs and winning the pennant was another step. Are they ready to win the World Series? They are still a young team ahead of schedule.
The Indians play hard every night and make the most of their opportunities. The starting pitching was dominant all season long but now injuries have thinned that depth; fortunately, the bullpen that gave me heartburn all year long has been re-designed and has been the MVP of the team so far in the post-season. The Indians are lovely mix of youth and veterans, they could use more pop in the lineup but they steal bases at a high rate, the defense is above average and Francona is a masterful button-pusher. And, again, these guys really love each other, a chaotic force that makes a good team great.
The Cubs are young and talented at every position, they're the better team on the field every night. The starting pitching was solid, the bullpen too. Not a lot of veteran presence on this squad, they're really young all over. They kinda love each other but mostly they're young and goofy and don't know anything but success, so they trust each other. These guys are a Richard Linklater cast of characters out there having fun and winning because they don't know how to lose. And their coach, Joe Madden, is also a master motivator and tactician (and went head-to-head with Francona for years in the AL East).
Who's gonna make the mistakes? That's what this series is all about. Indians mistakes: giving up home runs, running into outs, hitting into double plays, missing the scoring opportunities. Cubs mistakes: errors, hesitating on the base paths, pitchers getting dribbed and drabbed into giving up big innings. Could go either way.
The Indians are hard working consistent team, they have bad nights but they bounce back quickly (because they love each other). The Cubs are just damn good, they have bad nights but they're damn good and they expect to be damn good more often than not. Indians pitching at its best is, I think, better than the Cubs; if the Indian pitchers are dealing, the Cubs might evaporate. The Cubs have more talent, the Indians have more savvy. I really think these teams match up well and this will be a good series. Obviously as an Indians fan I'd prefer the Cubs lose but as a general baseball fan, I'd love to see the Cubs win (curious to see what that looks like honestly). I'm really looking forward to this, I can't lose!
I think it goes 7 games. First thought: the Cubs are cool customers, they'll be fine in game 7 while the veteran Indians will get over anxious and bunge up. Second thought: reverse that. The Cubs youngsters will feel the pressure of the coming expectations weigh on them while the Indians vets will feel the joy of house money and play loose and zen like. Yeah, I'm biased, I'm going with the latter. I'll take the Indians in 7.
The Cubs, on the other hand, caught my eye last year while pummeling the Cards in the playoffs. They faltered against the Mets but that's okay, they're a young team that was already ahead of schedule. You could tell that 2016 was gonna be their year. They avoided the pitfalls, sidestepped all the tragedies (curses and whatnot), and dominated the NL like they should've. Winning the division was a big step, getting through the playoffs and winning the pennant was another step. Are they ready to win the World Series? They are still a young team ahead of schedule.
The Indians play hard every night and make the most of their opportunities. The starting pitching was dominant all season long but now injuries have thinned that depth; fortunately, the bullpen that gave me heartburn all year long has been re-designed and has been the MVP of the team so far in the post-season. The Indians are lovely mix of youth and veterans, they could use more pop in the lineup but they steal bases at a high rate, the defense is above average and Francona is a masterful button-pusher. And, again, these guys really love each other, a chaotic force that makes a good team great.
The Cubs are young and talented at every position, they're the better team on the field every night. The starting pitching was solid, the bullpen too. Not a lot of veteran presence on this squad, they're really young all over. They kinda love each other but mostly they're young and goofy and don't know anything but success, so they trust each other. These guys are a Richard Linklater cast of characters out there having fun and winning because they don't know how to lose. And their coach, Joe Madden, is also a master motivator and tactician (and went head-to-head with Francona for years in the AL East).
Who's gonna make the mistakes? That's what this series is all about. Indians mistakes: giving up home runs, running into outs, hitting into double plays, missing the scoring opportunities. Cubs mistakes: errors, hesitating on the base paths, pitchers getting dribbed and drabbed into giving up big innings. Could go either way.
The Indians are hard working consistent team, they have bad nights but they bounce back quickly (because they love each other). The Cubs are just damn good, they have bad nights but they're damn good and they expect to be damn good more often than not. Indians pitching at its best is, I think, better than the Cubs; if the Indian pitchers are dealing, the Cubs might evaporate. The Cubs have more talent, the Indians have more savvy. I really think these teams match up well and this will be a good series. Obviously as an Indians fan I'd prefer the Cubs lose but as a general baseball fan, I'd love to see the Cubs win (curious to see what that looks like honestly). I'm really looking forward to this, I can't lose!
I think it goes 7 games. First thought: the Cubs are cool customers, they'll be fine in game 7 while the veteran Indians will get over anxious and bunge up. Second thought: reverse that. The Cubs youngsters will feel the pressure of the coming expectations weigh on them while the Indians vets will feel the joy of house money and play loose and zen like. Yeah, I'm biased, I'm going with the latter. I'll take the Indians in 7.
NBA Pre-Season Predictions
Cavs (64 wins) Warriors (70)
Celtics (52) Spurs (61)
Pacers (49) Clippers (53)
Raptors (47) Rockets (50)
Hawks (44) Jazz (44)
Wizards (44) Thunder (42)
Hornets (44) Grizzlies (42)
Pistons (42) Blazers (41)
Knicks (41) Wolves (41)
Bucks (34) Pelicans (38)
Magic (34) Mavs (33)
Bulls (32) Kings (31)
Heat (28) Nuggets (26)
Sixers (23) Lakers (25)
Nets (14) Suns (25)
Cavs over Pistons; Warriors over Blazers
Celtics over Hornets; Spurs over Grizzlies
Pacers over Wizards; Clippers over Thunder
Hawks over Raptors; Rockets over Jazz
Cavs overs Hawks; Warriors over Rockets (gonna be a killer game 7!)
Pacers over Celtics; Clippers over Spurs (gonna be a killer game 7!)
Cavs over Pacers; Warriors over Clippers (oh damn, gonna be a killer game 7!)
Warriors over Cavs in 5
MVP: Paul George (Pacers)
Coach of the Year: Brad Stevens (Celtics)
Rookie of the Year: Buddy Hield (Pelicans)
6th Man: Monta Ellis (Pacers)
Most Improved: Aaron Gordon (Magic)
Celtics (52) Spurs (61)
Pacers (49) Clippers (53)
Raptors (47) Rockets (50)
Hawks (44) Jazz (44)
Wizards (44) Thunder (42)
Hornets (44) Grizzlies (42)
Pistons (42) Blazers (41)
Knicks (41) Wolves (41)
Bucks (34) Pelicans (38)
Magic (34) Mavs (33)
Bulls (32) Kings (31)
Heat (28) Nuggets (26)
Sixers (23) Lakers (25)
Nets (14) Suns (25)
Cavs over Pistons; Warriors over Blazers
Celtics over Hornets; Spurs over Grizzlies
Pacers over Wizards; Clippers over Thunder
Hawks over Raptors; Rockets over Jazz
Cavs overs Hawks; Warriors over Rockets (gonna be a killer game 7!)
Pacers over Celtics; Clippers over Spurs (gonna be a killer game 7!)
Cavs over Pacers; Warriors over Clippers (oh damn, gonna be a killer game 7!)
Warriors over Cavs in 5
MVP: Paul George (Pacers)
Coach of the Year: Brad Stevens (Celtics)
Rookie of the Year: Buddy Hield (Pelicans)
6th Man: Monta Ellis (Pacers)
Most Improved: Aaron Gordon (Magic)
Sunday, October 9, 2016
NFL Week Four (NFC)
After four weeks it's time to reevaluate how the NFL looks.
My newly re-jiggered playoff picture: Panthers over Cowboys, Packers over Falcons; Seahawks over Packers, Vikings over Panthers; Seahawks over Vikings.
Cowboys (9-7) -- Without Romo the Cowboys were left with a rookie QB to lead them. My initial thought was they struggle for a while then pull it together when Romo returned; but Dak Prescott has been pretty good and it looks like Romo will return to a strong squad hungry for a playoff run. Or...maybe not. Now it feels to me that they'll succeed just fine with Dak and be ready for a string of injuries and setbacks when Romo returns. I'm not saying the Cowboys are worse than I thought but I'm not saying they're better either. They're strangely just about the same. I still like them to win 9 games and the division.
Giants (8-8) -- The Giants are ruled by the Eli Principle: Eli makes bad teams good and good teams bad. So are the Giants good enough to sabotaged by Eli or poor enough to be elevated by him? Ehh, I think this year is kind of a wash. The D line isn't bad, I like receivers but the rest of the team is kinda middling. I think Eli won't have that much to say about how far this team goes. They're not bad, they'll hang around and wait for the Cowboys to blow it but I think they're a middle of the road team in the end. 8 wins and no playoffs.
Eagles (7-9) -- Everyone loves Carson Wentz and I don't disagree, the kid looks like he knows what he doing out there. But I'm afraid his success will only screw up the rebuilding process (like when the Niners brought in Mariucci to take the fall after Siefert only for Jeff Garcia to shock the hell out of everyone). The Eagles were supposed to be mailing it in this season (the Hinkie Effect) but the rook is actually pretty good, which will only drop the draft position and distort next year's schedule. Fortunately I don't think he's gonna be good this year. The Eagles have gotten off to a great start but I suspect that'll come back to earth after the league has more video of the new QB. The Eagles look like a 7 win team to me.
Redskins (6-10) -- The Redskins are the Buffalo Bills, aren't they? Born to be 6-10: not good enough for the playoffs, not bad enough for a top draft pick. Just right there in the middle, year after year. Likewise, they're stuck in the middle with Kirk Cousins: he won't be back next year because if he's good, he'll split and if he's bad they won't want him. An odd situation for a QB. This team has its moments but it already feels like they're just playing out the string til next year.
Vikings (12-4) -- In my pre-pre-season preidctions I had the Vikings going 0-16. On second thought I decided that not only were they not a historically bad team but they were actually probably pretty good. Now that I've seen that D for 4 weeks, I think they might be the best team in the league. That D is scary and the offense (even w/out Adrian Peterson) is patient, nimbly picking their spots and even the special teams looks capable of timely big play or two. Kinda love the coach, Sam Bradford is doing what you need a QB to do and that D line is probably the best in the league. I like them to win 12 games and the division (and be a tough out in the playoffs).
Packers (10-6) -- After all these years with Aaron Rodgers, the Packers still have no offensive identity, isn't that weird? I know what I'm getting with Brady or Roethlisberger or even Andy Dalton. But with the Packers its still just Rodgers running for his life and getting lucky enough to make the playoffs. The D is fine but nothing superlative, the special teams, too, is middle of the road, the O line isn't great and the skill players are so-so. Rodgers really is a badass, he's been carrying this team and I guess he will again. I still like them to make playoffs with 10 wins.
Lions (4-12) -- The Lions are the bizarro Titans: the Titans are plucky and will play hard enough to keep them in games despite their mediocre talent while the Lions have a weird sense of veteran entitlement and will probably play themselves out of games that they ought to be in. Stafford has moments of badass-ery and then throws 3 straight picks. Everything about the team is utterly mediocre but good enough to maybe sneak some W's at the end of the year if Stafford can get hot. (Can't believe I'm saying this but I can see the Lions being next year's pre-season dark horse darling) 4 wins sounds about right: they're about a notch below the Bills and Redskins.
Bears (3-13) -- Man, I think the Bears are terrible. I wasn't expecting them to be good this year but I thought middle of the road and they are not that, they're over in the ditch. I don't see this team wins at all, they're playing for a draft pick already.
Falcons (10-6) -- The Falcons in the Matty Ryan years have consistently been a tease: keep waiting for that offense to take off and it never does. This year it has. The D is not very good (though are showing signs of improvement) but Ryan and Julio Jones have that attack humming. With their division rivals all disappointing expectations so far, it feels like the Falcons are on the right path. I'm only giving them 10 wins though it feels like they ought to move, right? I gotta feeling they give away games late in the season and back into the playoffs.
Panthers (9-7) -- Last year the Panthers pummeled everyone (until the Super Bowl) and while we all knew they weren't gonna be that good again, I expected them to be among the best in the NFC. But so far they seem to have regressed all over the field: the pass D isn't getting as many stops and Cam is looking decidedly human so far. I think they'll pull it together but I'm guessing it'll be too late and they fall short of the playoffs. I still like them to get 9 wins and sneak a wild card.
Bucs (6-10) -- Yes, I fell for the Buc hype again this season. I thought the D would regain classic form, Jamies would take a big step up and they'd ride a mediocre strength of schedule into the playoffs. Not so much. They've got decent talent on both sides of the ball which only means we'll be falling for the hype again next year. The good news is they're not a retread 6-10 (like the Redskins), they're an up-and-coming 6-10 (like the Titans). The bad news is they ain't making the playoffs this year (and we were all fools for thinking they could).
Saints (5-11) -- Do these guys even care any more? Brees is still good enough to muscle a few W's off teams that don't bring their best game but if the opponent shows out strong, the Saints don't have much of a shot at a win. Sad but true: Brees isn't the problem but the solution only comes when he leaves.
Seahawks (12-4) -- The offensive line has been shaky so far this year but that feels like a problem that can be corrected. Otherwise, I think they're looking pretty good on both sides of the ball and by the end of the year could be a real juggernaut heading into the playoffs. I think they easily take the division and get 12 wins.
Cards (9-7) -- I thought the Cards were really impressive last year (until that egg they laid in the NFC Championship) and it felt like they would have another strong year. But, like the Bengals, they seem like a team that peaked last year and missed their opportunity. Carson Palmer looks done and the rest of the squad is not bad but seems on the way down. I bet they'll be streaky for the rest of the year, a handful of a solid weeks followed by a handful of puzzling losses. I'll give 'em 9 wins just because they were so fun to watch last year.
Rams (8-8) -- Perfect Jeff Fisher 8-8 team. Great D line but nothing else ever comes together. They have moments of dominating defense that'll win a few games but the offense just seems like a project. Good enough to get to 8 wins, I guess.
Niners (3-13) -- Yeech, these guys are terrible. God, it wasn't that long ago that were talented and deep at every position and now they're just awful. (Hmm, could Kentucky pry Chip Kelly away from San Fran after one horrible year? Just a thought)
My newly re-jiggered playoff picture: Panthers over Cowboys, Packers over Falcons; Seahawks over Packers, Vikings over Panthers; Seahawks over Vikings.
Thursday, October 6, 2016
NFL Week Four (AFC)
In the pre-season I made team by team projections. Then I second guessed myself. Now we've seen four weeks of football and its time for a proper power ranking. Since my interest is largely self-referential, I'll look at each team through the prism of my previous projections of them. Where was I right? Where was I wrong?
Patriots -- I had them winning 12 games this year...yeah, I was right. Even with that unusual loss at home to Buffalo, they're still 3-1 without Brady or Gronk in a division that looks so so soft. The D is a little unpredictable, but at their best they look pretty damn good. Hard to imagine the Pats not making the playoffs in the AFC, clearly they're still the face to win that division and wouldn't be shocked if they went undefeated for the rest of the year.
Dolphins -- I initially picked the DOlphins to win 7 games, then reconsidered them up to 9. Ehhhh, that D line is a one of the best in the league but nothing else about the team is particularly noteworthy. That said, right around 8 wins doesn't seem inconceivable considering that their D looks better than Buffalo or NYJ and their QB, while underwhelming, doesn't look to be a crippling drawback (as seems possible for their division foes). I think I still like the Dolphins to finished 2nd in the East, though I don't see them competing for a Wild Card.
Bills -- The Bills have some potential upside (interesting weapons on offense that have yet to gel) but debilitating downside, too (flaky pass defense, a coach permanently on the hot seat, an offense that could turn to mush at a moment's notice). The thing about this team is they'll have some great games and they'll have some truly awful games, making them either the most exciting 6-10 team ever or the shakiest 11-5 team ever. I think they're closer to the 6-10 team.
Jets -- I wasn't won over by the emergency signing of Ryan Fitzpatrick, dubious about the signing of Matt Forte, no idea about the coach, no real impression of the D or the skill players on offense. Okay: I really like that D line and the receiving corps has good variation and depth. That's it. If Fitzpatrick gets it together, the Jets can win some games but unless he does (and I doubt he will) the Jets are the classic 5-11 kinda squad.
Bengals -- I watched the Bengals a lot last year and I was impressed. But rather than keeping that vibe going, it increasingly looks like they had their chance last year and missed it. The offense isn't as crisp as last year, the D isn't as strong. They don't suck but they are decidedly 2nd tier in the AFC rather than being the pick to go to the Super Bowl (as they were for me in pre-season). I still think they're a playoff team but I don't think they're as consistently good as the Steelers. I expect them to compete with the AFC West leftovers for a playoff spot and I think they'll take one. But they'll ride into the post-season as a Wild Card rather than a division winner. Bengals are a solid 10-6 team.
Steelers -- The D is still a work in progress and the offense is kinda one-dimensional. However, that one dimension is maybe the best in the league. Ben over the top to those receivers followed by doses of underneath to RBs in the flat is pretty tough to stop. There are pass rushes that can interrupt that and there are offenses that could maybe match the attack, but week in/week out the Steelers are gonna be one of the better teams in the league. I'll take them to go 12-4.
Ravens -- I had the Ravens winning 3 games. They've already won 3 games (squeakers over the Bills, Browns and Jags), seems like they're gonna be awesome, right? Ehhh, I'm not sold. Flacco is firmly on the high side of mediocre: better than middle of the road but not much. The D doesn't suck but doesn't make plays, the O line is suspect and the skill players are not ideal. Okay, this team is already better than I thought they'd be and they'll probably win a few more squeakers (they'll win the types of games the Chargers are losing) but I don't see them winning much more than that. Ravens 6-10.
Browns -- I had the Browns winning 2 games because...well...even the crappiest teams usually win 2 games. The Browns are probably the crappiest team. So I'll stick with 2-14 for the Browns.
Texans -- I had the Texans winning 9 games and their division. Strangely enough even though they've lost JJ Watt for the year and Brock Osweiler is not terribly impressive at QB, even though the Texans are clearly not as good as I thought they could be, I still think they win 9 games and the division. That division stinks and the Texans feel like the least stinky, so I'm sticking with what I thought before.
Jags -- The Jags were one of everyone's favorite dark horse team in pre-season and I kinda got swept up in that. The Jags have sucked for a while now and though they look better than they have in a while, they still don't seem dangerous at all. I thought they'd win 8 games and maybe be a spoiler team and while they're not that good, they look like the kinda team that could sneak some W's late in the season. I'll take them to win 7 games.
Colts -- Andrew Luck is truly one of the best QBs in the league but, my god, the rest of the team is awful. Frank Gore is still surprisingly effective but the O line is abysmal, the receivers are disappointing, the special teams has no magic and the D is one of the worst in the league. And, just to pile on, I think their coach is pretty terrible. But they still have Luck so I'll give them 5 wins.
Titans -- The Titans are plucky, not good but they'll work hard and sneak some wins that they shouldn't get. But they'll lose more than they win and occasionally just look awful. They look like a classic 6-10 team.
Raiders -- I thought the Raiders would bust out, taking steps forward on both sides of the ball. Well, they have moments of bust out but just as often play the youngsters they are. I think they're gonna be pretty good but the lack of veteran presence is gonna fail them a few times this year, while youthful exuberance will only help them once or twice. I still like the Raiders to take a Wild Card and win 10 games.
Chiefs -- I thought the Chiefs would build on last year's improvement and firmly take a Wild Card spot. But so far they don't look quite as good as last year, they can beat bad teams but I'm not sure they can hang with good ones. I think they go 9-6 and miss the playoffs.
Broncos -- I thought the Broncos would miss Jackson and Trevathan on D and struggle at the QB spot on offense and take a serious step back. Nope. That D is every bit as fierce as last year (Von Miller looks ready to jump from Super Bowl MVP to League MVP). And I've been impressed with both of their young QBs, Simien and Lynch both look capable of being goo enough. The running game is solid, the special teams are solid, the overall vibe is exactly where it ought to be. The Broncos are much better than I would've thought. I like them to win the west and go 12-4.
I've shuffled the rankings but I'm still in on 5 (Pats, Bengals, Steelers, Texans, Raiders) of my 6 playoff projections with the Broncos supplanting the Chiefs. So to re-prosecute the playoff projections: Steelers over Raiders, Bengals over Texans; Pats over Bengals, Steelers over Broncos; Steelers over Pats for the AFC final.
Patriots -- I had them winning 12 games this year...yeah, I was right. Even with that unusual loss at home to Buffalo, they're still 3-1 without Brady or Gronk in a division that looks so so soft. The D is a little unpredictable, but at their best they look pretty damn good. Hard to imagine the Pats not making the playoffs in the AFC, clearly they're still the face to win that division and wouldn't be shocked if they went undefeated for the rest of the year.
Dolphins -- I initially picked the DOlphins to win 7 games, then reconsidered them up to 9. Ehhhh, that D line is a one of the best in the league but nothing else about the team is particularly noteworthy. That said, right around 8 wins doesn't seem inconceivable considering that their D looks better than Buffalo or NYJ and their QB, while underwhelming, doesn't look to be a crippling drawback (as seems possible for their division foes). I think I still like the Dolphins to finished 2nd in the East, though I don't see them competing for a Wild Card.
Bills -- The Bills have some potential upside (interesting weapons on offense that have yet to gel) but debilitating downside, too (flaky pass defense, a coach permanently on the hot seat, an offense that could turn to mush at a moment's notice). The thing about this team is they'll have some great games and they'll have some truly awful games, making them either the most exciting 6-10 team ever or the shakiest 11-5 team ever. I think they're closer to the 6-10 team.
Jets -- I wasn't won over by the emergency signing of Ryan Fitzpatrick, dubious about the signing of Matt Forte, no idea about the coach, no real impression of the D or the skill players on offense. Okay: I really like that D line and the receiving corps has good variation and depth. That's it. If Fitzpatrick gets it together, the Jets can win some games but unless he does (and I doubt he will) the Jets are the classic 5-11 kinda squad.
Bengals -- I watched the Bengals a lot last year and I was impressed. But rather than keeping that vibe going, it increasingly looks like they had their chance last year and missed it. The offense isn't as crisp as last year, the D isn't as strong. They don't suck but they are decidedly 2nd tier in the AFC rather than being the pick to go to the Super Bowl (as they were for me in pre-season). I still think they're a playoff team but I don't think they're as consistently good as the Steelers. I expect them to compete with the AFC West leftovers for a playoff spot and I think they'll take one. But they'll ride into the post-season as a Wild Card rather than a division winner. Bengals are a solid 10-6 team.
Steelers -- The D is still a work in progress and the offense is kinda one-dimensional. However, that one dimension is maybe the best in the league. Ben over the top to those receivers followed by doses of underneath to RBs in the flat is pretty tough to stop. There are pass rushes that can interrupt that and there are offenses that could maybe match the attack, but week in/week out the Steelers are gonna be one of the better teams in the league. I'll take them to go 12-4.
Ravens -- I had the Ravens winning 3 games. They've already won 3 games (squeakers over the Bills, Browns and Jags), seems like they're gonna be awesome, right? Ehhh, I'm not sold. Flacco is firmly on the high side of mediocre: better than middle of the road but not much. The D doesn't suck but doesn't make plays, the O line is suspect and the skill players are not ideal. Okay, this team is already better than I thought they'd be and they'll probably win a few more squeakers (they'll win the types of games the Chargers are losing) but I don't see them winning much more than that. Ravens 6-10.
Browns -- I had the Browns winning 2 games because...well...even the crappiest teams usually win 2 games. The Browns are probably the crappiest team. So I'll stick with 2-14 for the Browns.
Texans -- I had the Texans winning 9 games and their division. Strangely enough even though they've lost JJ Watt for the year and Brock Osweiler is not terribly impressive at QB, even though the Texans are clearly not as good as I thought they could be, I still think they win 9 games and the division. That division stinks and the Texans feel like the least stinky, so I'm sticking with what I thought before.
Jags -- The Jags were one of everyone's favorite dark horse team in pre-season and I kinda got swept up in that. The Jags have sucked for a while now and though they look better than they have in a while, they still don't seem dangerous at all. I thought they'd win 8 games and maybe be a spoiler team and while they're not that good, they look like the kinda team that could sneak some W's late in the season. I'll take them to win 7 games.
Colts -- Andrew Luck is truly one of the best QBs in the league but, my god, the rest of the team is awful. Frank Gore is still surprisingly effective but the O line is abysmal, the receivers are disappointing, the special teams has no magic and the D is one of the worst in the league. And, just to pile on, I think their coach is pretty terrible. But they still have Luck so I'll give them 5 wins.
Titans -- The Titans are plucky, not good but they'll work hard and sneak some wins that they shouldn't get. But they'll lose more than they win and occasionally just look awful. They look like a classic 6-10 team.
Raiders -- I thought the Raiders would bust out, taking steps forward on both sides of the ball. Well, they have moments of bust out but just as often play the youngsters they are. I think they're gonna be pretty good but the lack of veteran presence is gonna fail them a few times this year, while youthful exuberance will only help them once or twice. I still like the Raiders to take a Wild Card and win 10 games.
Chiefs -- I thought the Chiefs would build on last year's improvement and firmly take a Wild Card spot. But so far they don't look quite as good as last year, they can beat bad teams but I'm not sure they can hang with good ones. I think they go 9-6 and miss the playoffs.
Broncos -- I thought the Broncos would miss Jackson and Trevathan on D and struggle at the QB spot on offense and take a serious step back. Nope. That D is every bit as fierce as last year (Von Miller looks ready to jump from Super Bowl MVP to League MVP). And I've been impressed with both of their young QBs, Simien and Lynch both look capable of being goo enough. The running game is solid, the special teams are solid, the overall vibe is exactly where it ought to be. The Broncos are much better than I would've thought. I like them to win the west and go 12-4.
I've shuffled the rankings but I'm still in on 5 (Pats, Bengals, Steelers, Texans, Raiders) of my 6 playoff projections with the Broncos supplanting the Chiefs. So to re-prosecute the playoff projections: Steelers over Raiders, Bengals over Texans; Pats over Bengals, Steelers over Broncos; Steelers over Pats for the AFC final.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
