So Jason Giambi says the league should be more honest and come clean with the public about steroids. Soon after, a report comes out that Giambi tested positive for amphetamines last year.
Now we're supposed to point and laugh at Giambi and say, 'he's a fraud for calling out others when he's clearly guilty himself'.
But if the powers-that-be can withhold a positive test until a player says something the league takes offense to, then how many more positive tests are out there that we haven't been told about yet? Doesn't this prove that Giambi is correct for calling out the league?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment